Pixel Count:
When comparing 2160p and 4K, it’s important to note that they essentially refer to the same resolution. The term 4K is derived from the horizontal pixel count, while 2160p refers to the vertical pixel count. This semantic difference doesn’t change the fact that both offer the same level of detail and image quality.
Cost:
The cost of 2160p and 4K displays has been decreasing as technology advances and becomes more mainstream. However, the cost of content production and distribution in 4K remains higher due to the increased data requirements. This cost is often passed on to the consumer, making 4K content and devices more expensive than their 1080p counterparts.
Content Availability:
While the availability of 4K content is growing, with streaming platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video offering a selection of 4K titles, it is still limited compared to the vast library of HD content. Physical media, such as Blu-ray discs, also offer 4K options, but the selection is not as extensive as standard Blu-ray.
Hardware Requirements:
To fully enjoy 2160p or 4K content, one needs a compatible display and the necessary hardware, such as a powerful graphics card and a processor capable of handling the increased data load. This can be a significant investment, especially for gamers and content creators who require high-performance equipment.
Future-Proofing:
Investing in 2160p/4K technology today is a bet on the future. As technology continues to evolve, with 8K and beyond on the horizon, choosing a 2160p/4K setup now means the equipment is likely to remain relevant for several years, offering a longer lifespan than lower-resolution setups.
Read also: 2160p vs 4K: Which Resolution Is Better?